Many have gone out to bat for Foxcatcher’s particularly dour format of carefully positioned gloominess, and they are right to focus on the film’s meticulous craft. It’s a stolid, compartmentalized film, assured and close to perfectionist in its specific, highly detailed character, its rigid delineation of human frailty, and its formal precision backing up an intentionally cold-and-clinical dissection of American inequality. Grotesque millionaire John Du Pont (Steve Carrell) fancies himself an American hero and plays with Olympic wrestler Mark Scultz (Channing Tatum) from beginning to end, but director Bennett Miller would not have you think of it as play. Through his eyes, the film is as detached and despondent as humanly possible, perhaps fitting for the films’ themes of mechanical people sleepwalking their way through life with bored non-momentum. Yet style and story clash and never occupy the same film, smothering clinical precision with the film’s weepy, drippy “important story” narrative and sacrificing the sweat and spit of genuine emotion for a staid waxworks show. Foxcatcher is a perfectionist film, but it gives perfectionism a bad name. Continue reading
Monthly Archives: January 2015
Review: No
Although the material, and director Pablo Lorrain’s muck-racking credentials, would beg to differ, No is no glum, morose drama. Far from it, in fact. It takes a shot of endorphins and battles the lows of the human experience with the highs of sharp, provocative filmmaking and an effervescent not-so-dark comic streak, tackling a serious subject and having a small, self-contained blast doing it. Kudos to Lorrain for following in the spirit of his main character and infusing politics with spunk and pizzaz, even if he runs into a few queasy moral calms along the way.
Slightly-diluted pop-grim aesthetic and rigorous commitment to handheld footage in tow, Lorrain’s scrappy spirit leaves Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet flustered and sweating, but not truly broken. This isn’t a dissection of Pinochet the man or Chilean democracy at large, even if the film makes its intent clear and its contemptuous spirit well-known. Instead, it has its sights set on the news media, and even there it has mixed opinions. That it finds warmth and lush buoyancy in this confusion about what to do with political pragmatism is perhaps a political and moral problem, but it is also inescapably the key to the movie’s success as vibrant cinema. Continue reading
Stocking Stuffer Reviews: Ernest and Celestine and The Place Beyond the Pines
Ernest and Celestine
Ernest and Celestline is a children’s film, and damn proud of it. Light, frothy, and bolstered by the elegant simplicity of a storybook brought to life by watercolor and sketchbook, it has absolutely no airs, and yet it exists with its head in the clouds. The story is note-perfect in its simplicity: a bear, Ernest, and a mouse, Celestine, are both outcasts – Ernest a poor loner who lives on the outskirts of his society and Celestine a young, seemingly orphaned dreamer who dares to interpret bears through a lens of whimsy rather than fear. The two meet up and form a friendship, become a furry, feral Bonnie and Clyde, and discover a home in the process. Continue reading
Twenty Films by Directors in their Twilight Years (Over 60 Years Old at the Time of Release)
Hi All,
Here’s a new list I wrote for Taste of Cinema about films by directors in their twilight years, proving that talent and passion don’t necessarily fall off with age, linked below.
Some of the films included in the list: Eyes Wide Shut by Stanley Kubrick, Short Cuts by Robert Altman, Unforgiven by Clint Eastwood, The Searchers by John Ford, Fanny and Alexander by Ingmar Bergman, Grizzly Man by Werner Herzog, L’ Argent by Robert Bresson, Amour by Michael Haneke, Ran by Akira Kurosawa, The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie by Luis Bunuel, Rio Bravo by Howard Hawks, and The Birds by Alfred Hitchcock, and many more!
Review: The Lords of Salem
Rob Zombie is not a particularly nuanced filmmaker, but then nuance isn’t everything. Sometimes, a parade of bravura, shoot-for-the-gutter images and sounds is all you need, and if nothing else, The Lords of Salem is a fairly stunning little devil of images and sounds lined up for us by the naughtiest ringmaster this side of Italian giallo. After all, and at the risk of sounding too classicist, early cinema was nothing more than a parade of images to amuse and titillate, to vex and induce wonderment, and to distill and massage emotion out of the purity of look and feel. Those were the wild years of cinema, a period of looking to the future. Of course, Rob Zombie, here and always, looks to the past. But in it he finds something no less woolly, no less feral, and no less sensitive to the primitive power of feverish film imagery at its most direct.
His own wife Sheri Moon Zombie and a fiendish little ditty about the town history of Salem Massachusetts in tow, Zombie sets out for this sort of direct line between his script and the images he wishes to induce and caress out of it. On paper, it’s a tentative mixture of ambiguous character and enigmatic, not-quite-psychological horror (it’s too willfully difficult and primordial, and probably too literal to earn the psychological horror bent everyone who likes the film wants to bestow upon it). Sheri Moon Zombie stars as a middle-aged single Salem shock-jock radio DJ who receives a mysterious musical curio early in the film, a peculiar LP equal parts of metallic rust and Gothic haunt that soon enough reveals itself to do much more than serenade the ears with raw nails and screws.
